top of page
Won Brazilian restaurant-tech relevance by building an entire digital ordering solution in seven days flat when COVID-19 hit — a company that had spent six years building in-house tablet and kiosk ordering for named brands (KFC, Spoleto) pivoted its whole business toward delivery specifically because its existing infrastructure could be repurposed almost instantly.
1
MODEL
BUSINESS MODEL
SaaS, White Label
model bm
HOW THEY BUILT IT
- Founded 2014 in Sorocaba, Brazil by Felipe M. Lo Sardo, Rafael Marcili Laganaro, and Daniel Targino Wassano, initially building tablet-based digital menu ordering solutions before developing self-service kiosks for well-known Brazilian restaurant chains including Madero, Jeronimo, Spoleto, and KFC.
- Pivoted rapidly into delivery-focused digital ordering in March 2020 when COVID-19 restrictions hit Brazil, building a complete menu-and-ordering solution routed through WhatsApp within seven days — reusing its existing tablet-ordering technology foundation rather than building delivery infrastructure from scratch.
- Positioned explicitly against traditional delivery marketplaces (iFood, Rappi, Uber Eats) that charge commissions up to 30% per order, offering a zero-commission alternative where restaurants keep 100% of order value and pay only a fixed monthly subscription fee regardless of order volume.
- Grew to serve over 500,000 food businesses (per company statements), later merging with Abrahão (formerly OiMenu, itself founded by a former Goomer customer) to combine complementary marketing/customer-acquisition strengths with Goomer's broader technology platform.
HOW TO ARCHITECT IT
1. When an external shock (a pandemic) suddenly makes an adjacent capability (delivery) urgently necessary, look for ways to repurpose your existing technology infrastructure (tablet-ordering systems) rather than building the new capability from scratch — Goomer's seven-day pivot depended entirely on reusing infrastructure it had already spent years building for a different use case.
2. Position explicitly against commission-based marketplace competitors on the specific dimension (a fixed, predictable monthly fee versus a percentage-of-order commission that scales with success) that matters most to your target customer's margin structure.
3. Consider merging with a complementary competitor (as Goomer did with Abrahão/OiMenu, itself started by a former Goomer customer) when the combination genuinely strengthens distinct capabilities (technology depth plus marketing/acquisition strength) rather than simply consolidating overlapping offerings.
DISTRIBUTION MODEL
Direct Sales, SEO Distribution, WhatsApp Distribution
dm
HOW THEY OPERATIONALIZED
Distributed via direct sales to restaurant owners combined with WhatsApp-based ordering (leveraging the app's near-universal adoption among Brazilian consumers) and SEO-driven content marketing targeting restaurant owners researching alternatives to commission-heavy delivery marketplaces.
HOW TO REPLICATE WHAT WORKED
What worked: repurposing existing tablet-ordering technology infrastructure to build a complete delivery ordering solution within seven days when COVID-19 made delivery suddenly urgent, rather than building delivery capability from scratch under emergency time pressure. Trap if copied blindly: positioning explicitly against commission-based marketplaces on price alone works only if your product genuinely replaces the marketplace's core value (customer discovery/acquisition) — Goomer's own CEO acknowledges restaurants still need to do their own marketing to drive traffic to a zero-commission direct ordering system, a real trade-off a founder should be transparent about rather than implying a fixed-fee model eliminates all customer-acquisition cost.
| PATTERNS OF THIS MODEL
PATTERNS IN REUSING INFRASTRUCTURE DURING A DEMAND SHOCK:
1. WHEN A SHOCK MAKES AN ADJACENT CAPABILITY URGENT, REPURPOSE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE RATHER THAN BUILDING FROM SCRATCH. Speed of response depends entirely on what you already have.
2. POSITION AGAINST COMMISSION-BASED MARKETPLACES ON THE DIMENSION THAT DETERMINES THE OPERATOR'S MARGIN — a fixed, predictable fee against a percentage that scales with their success.
3. MERGE WITH A COMPLEMENTARY COMPETITOR WHERE STRENGTHS GENUINELY DIFFER, rather than consolidating overlapping offerings for scale alone.
4. USE THE MESSAGING CHANNEL YOUR CUSTOMERS' CUSTOMERS ALREADY LIVE IN. Meeting demand where it already exists beats building a destination nobody visits.
What companies with this model reveal
| OPPORTUNITY INTELLIGENCE
GOLDMINE 1 — REPURPOSE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE WHEN A SHOCK DEMANDS SPEED.
Standard: a complete WhatsApp ordering solution shipped in seven days in March 2020 because tablet-ordering technology already existed. The pivot speed came from years of prior building, not from heroics.
GOLDMINE 2 — POSITION AGAINST THE COMMISSION MODEL, NOT THE COMPETITOR.
Standard: a fixed monthly fee against iFood and Rappi's up-to-30% commission is arithmetic a restaurant owner does immediately, and it attacks the margin structure rather than the feature set.
GOLDMINE 3 — MERGE WITH A COMPLEMENTARY RIVAL, NOT AN OVERLAPPING ONE.
Standard: combining with Abrahão — founded by a former Goomer customer — paired technology depth with marketing and acquisition strength.
THE PIT — ZERO-COMMISSION ORDERING MEANS THE MARKETPLACE STILL OWNS DEMAND.
Restaurants keep 100% of order value on orders they generate themselves. iFood and Rappi still control discovery, so you are selling a cost saving on the minority of volume rather than a demand channel.
THE SECOND PIT — BRAZILIAN RESTAURANT SOFTWARE IS LOW-ACV WITH HIGH SUPPORT NEEDS.
MOVE WITH CAUTION — WHATSAPP-DEPENDENT COMMERCE SITS INSIDE META'S PRICING AND POLICY.
Untapped Business Model / Gaps / Goldmines / Pits
Patterns & Insights
2
MARKET
mkt mt es
MARKET TYPE
Fragmented Market
WHY THEY WON
Brazilian restaurant delivery technology is fragmented between dominant commission-based marketplaces (iFood controlling over 80% of marketplace delivery orders) and a growing number of smaller point solutions (Goomer, Consumer, KCMS, and others) offering direct-ordering alternatives. Goomer won share specifically among restaurants seeking to reduce marketplace dependency. Transferable principle: even when one marketplace dominates a category overwhelmingly, restaurants' desire to reduce commission dependency and protect margins can sustain a durable niche for direct-ordering alternatives.
ENTRY STRATEGY
Greenfield Entry
EXECUTION
Goomer entered directly via sales to Brazilian restaurant chains starting with tablet-ordering solutions, the standard entry mode for a founder-led vertical SaaS startup building from its Sorocaba, Brazil base, later pivoting its go-to-market emphasis toward delivery once COVID-19 restrictions hit.
FOOTHOLD STRATEGY
fs
Beachhead Strategy
The beachhead was well-known Brazilian restaurant chains (Madero, Jeronimo, Spoleto, KFC) needing tablet-based and self-service kiosk ordering solutions — a reachable segment given Goomer's direct sales relationships with recognizable brands. From there, Goomer expanded into delivery ordering for a much broader base of smaller restaurants and food businesses once the pandemic made delivery capability urgent.
GROWTH CAMPAIGN
CAMPAIGNS THAT WORKED
Building the initial seven-day delivery/WhatsApp ordering solution in March 2020, the direct response to COVID-19 restrictions; positioning explicitly against iFood, Rappi, and Uber Eats's commission-based model with a zero-commission, fixed-fee alternative; the merger with Abrahão (formerly OiMenu), combining complementary marketing and technology strengths; growth to serving over 500,000 food businesses.
KEY LEARNING
If an external shock suddenly makes an adjacent capability urgently necessary for your customers, look for ways to repurpose your existing technology infrastructure rather than building the new capability entirely from scratch under emergency time pressure — and be transparent that a fixed-fee alternative to commission-based marketplaces still requires customers to invest in their own marketing and customer acquisition, since a marketplace's core value (discovery) isn't automatically replaced by a lower-cost ordering tool alone.
gc
Market Context
| MARKET INTELLIGENCE
THE STANDARD: Even where one marketplace dominates overwhelmingly, suppliers' desire to reduce commission dependency sustains a durable niche for direct-ordering alternatives.
RULE 1 — COMMISSION RESENTMENT IS A PERMANENT, RENEWABLE SALES ARGUMENT. Margin pressure from a dominant intermediary never resolves on its own.
RULE 2 — THE PITCH IS MARGIN RECOVERY, NOT CHANNEL REPLACEMENT. Restaurants keep the marketplace and use you to convert repeat customers direct.
RULE 3 — YOU DO NOT SUPPLY DEMAND, WHICH IS THE STRUCTURAL LIMIT. Only restaurants with existing customer relationships benefit.
RULE 4 — IN-STORE HARDWARE AND SELF-ORDERING DEEPEN THE RELATIONSHIP BEYOND DELIVERY. Owning the physical touchpoint is what the marketplace cannot replicate.
MARKET TYPE: Fragmented Market (restaurant direct ordering).
| MARKET ENTRY PLAYBOOK
THE STANDARD: A REGIONAL VERTICAL ENTRANT MUST FOLLOW ITS CUSTOMERS' CRISIS, EVEN WHEN IT MEANS CHANGING THE PRODUCT'S CENTRE.
RULE 1 — ENTER THROUGH THE HARDWARE OR WORKFLOW THE OPERATOR ALREADY WANTS.
Tablet ordering was the visible, fundable purchase; the software relationship followed.
RULE 2 — WHEN THE CHANNEL SHIFTS OVERNIGHT, REBUILD AROUND THE NEW CHANNEL IMMEDIATELY.
Restrictions moved value from in-venue ordering to delivery; the pivot preserved the customer base.
RULE 3 — LOCAL PAYMENT RAILS AND AGGREGATOR RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE REGIONAL MOAT.
Global vendors underinvest in exactly this plumbing.
How to enter
| FOOTHOLD STRATEGY PLAYBOOK
THE STANDARD: Land recognisable national chains first when the product is visible to the end consumer.
RULE 1 — WIN THE BRANDS EVERY OTHER OPERATOR WATCHES. In a national market, a handful of well-known chains adopting self-service ordering makes the category legitimate.
RULE 2 — DIRECT SALES IS CORRECT WHEN THE FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE FEW AND LARGE. Relationship-led selling reaches chains that will never respond to self-serve marketing.
RULE 3 — A SHOCK CAN OPEN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SEGMENT. When delivery becomes urgent for every small restaurant, the enterprise product must be repackaged fast for a mass market.
RULE 4 — HARDWARE-BASED DEPLOYMENTS CONSTRAIN GROWTH RATE. Kiosks and tablets require installation and capital that software alone does not.
How to get the first strong position
MARKET PATTERNS & PLAYBOOK
3
MONEY
money rev pri
REVENUE MODEL
Subscription
PRICING MODEL
Flat Rate Pricing
WHY THEY WON
Fixed monthly subscription fee regardless of order volume, positioned explicitly against commission-based marketplace competitors that charge a percentage of each order, letting restaurants keep 100% of order value after the flat subscription cost.
A flat monthly subscription fee scaling with feature tier (basic delivery menu vs. full tablet/kiosk/QR-code integrated solution), targeting restaurant owners who evaluate cost against the percentage-based commissions charged by traditional delivery marketplaces.
TARGET AUDIENCE
CUSTOMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR
tg cb
Independent restaurants and food businesses (buying affordable, commission-free direct ordering); restaurant chains and franchises (buying tablet and self-service kiosk ordering at scale); home-based food entrepreneurs — bakers, confectioners (buying simple digital menu tools for WhatsApp-based ordering).
Sales-assisted for larger restaurant chains, self-serve for smaller food businesses, typically triggered by frustration with marketplace commission costs or, during the pandemic specifically, urgent need for any digital ordering capability at all.
| PRICING INTELLIGENCE
What makes this model effective & make customers pay
Restaurant ordering software should price flat and sell against aggregator commission.
RULE 1 — A FIXED MONTHLY FEE IS THE ARGUMENT AGAINST PERCENTAGE-BASED MARKETPLACES.
Operators on thin margins feel every point of commission. Flat pricing removes the resentment you are selling against.
RULE 2 — OWNING THE CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP IS THE DURABLE VALUE.
Aggregators keep the diner data. Returning it is worth more than the fee difference.
RULE 3 — LOCAL PAYMENT METHODS AND LANGUAGE ARE THE DEFENCE AGAINST GLOBAL PLATFORMS.
Regional depth wins markets that international competitors serve generically.
RULE 4 — RESTAURANT MORTALITY IS A PERMANENT FLOOR UNDER CHURN.
Build net retention on payments attach, not on retention programmes.
A restaurateur is buying back the margin an aggregator takes. Positioning as the ally against an extractive intermediary supports loyalty that a feature comparison never would.
PRICE & REVENUE
| Revenue Risk - The biggest threat to revenue stability
A fixed monthly fee against commission-based marketplaces is strong positioning and forfeits participation in order volume entirely.
Restaurants keep using aggregators despite commissions because the orders are incremental — winning direct ordering means persuading a merchant to forgo demand.
Independent restaurant mortality is the churn floor.
Regional Latin American markets carry FX exposure and software budgets materially below US norms, capping ARPU.
No revenue, restaurant count or funding published.
Where the model can break
4
MOTION
GROWTH EXPANSION MODEL
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
motion ge cs
Product Line Expansion, Market Development
HOW THEY EXPAND
Goomer expanded from tablet-based in-restaurant ordering into QR code menus, self-service kiosks, and delivery/WhatsApp ordering, then further through its merger with Abrahão (formerly OiMenu), combining marketing/customer-acquisition strength with Goomer's broader technology platform to serve an expanded range of food business types.
Cost Leadership
HOW THEY COMPETE
Goomer's core competitive strategy centers on cost leadership relative to commission-based delivery marketplaces, a sequencing that requires restaurants to accept doing more of their own marketing and customer acquisition in exchange for avoiding the 20-30% commissions charged by dominant marketplaces like iFood.
GROWTH ENGINE
GTM
ge n gtm
Partnership Growth
Growth compounds through the Abrahão/OiMenu merger, combining Goomer's technology depth with a partner brand's stronger marketing and customer-acquisition capability, and through word-of-mouth within the tight-knit Brazilian restaurant owner community frustrated with marketplace commission costs. It would break down if dominant marketplaces (iFood) responded by reducing commission rates enough to remove the primary cost incentive driving restaurants toward direct-ordering alternatives.
Direct sales to restaurant chains combined with WhatsApp-based ordering leveraging near-universal Brazilian consumer adoption of the app, reinforced by SEO content marketing targeting restaurant owners researching alternatives to marketplace commissions.
SUSTAINING MOATS
Switching Costs, High Customer Lock-In, Brand Power, Technology Advantage (complex enterprise scenarios)
moat
Goomer's moat is primarily cost leadership relative to commission-based marketplaces, combined with the switching cost of migrating a restaurant's menu configuration, WhatsApp ordering setup, and staff training to a different ordering system — a moderate but real moat in a category where restaurants' primary complaint (marketplace commissions) gives Goomer a durable, specific reason for switching away from dominant incumbents.
| MOAT INTELLIGENCE
THE STANDARD: In emerging markets the winning restaurant platform is the one that removes the aggregator's commission, not the one with the best interface.
RULE 1 — COMMISSION AVOIDANCE IS A CALCULATION THE OPERATOR MAKES UNAIDED. Direct ordering that saves a double-digit percentage of each transaction sells itself in a category with thin margins.
RULE 2 — LOCAL PAYMENT METHODS AND MESSAGING HABITS DECIDE ADOPTION. Serving the payment rails and communication channels a region actually uses is a structural advantage global platforms are slow to build.
RULE 3 — SELF-SERVICE KIOSKS AND IN-STORE HARDWARE CREATE PHYSICAL SWITCHING COST, converting a software subscription into installed infrastructure.
THE SIGNAL: regional commerce platforms are defended by payment localisation more than by product. The moat holds precisely as long as the global entrants find the local rails too fiddly to support properly.
Why this company remains defensible
ARR & TAKEAWAY
ARR Journey - what to do at each stage
PRE-$1M ARR — SELL RESTAURANTS THEIR OWN ORDERING CHANNEL IN A DELIVERY-DOMINATED MARKET
In markets where a single delivery aggregator takes a large commission, direct ordering and self-service kiosks are a margin recovery product.
Sell on commission avoided, calculated in the operator's own numbers.
$1–5M ARR — SELF-SERVICE HARDWARE CHANGES THE ECONOMICS
Kiosks and QR ordering reduce staffing cost and raise average ticket — two measurable outcomes rather than a software feature.
WATCH: orders through owned channels versus aggregator volume.
$5–10M ARR — CHAINS ROLL OUT, INDEPENDENTS CHURN
Multi-location groups justify the installation and support model; single restaurants rarely do.
$10–50M ARR — PAYMENTS AND FINANCING FOLLOW THE ORDER
Once you process the transaction, working capital products become an underwriting decision you can already make.
NOTE: no ARR disclosed; band placement is inference.
$50–100M ARR — REGIONAL CONSOLIDATION IN RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGY
Latin American restaurant software consolidates around payments and POS players. Depth in ordering is a component.
$100M+ ARR — NOT IN EVIDENCE
Rule: selling independence from an aggregator works when you can quantify the commission saved. Without that number it is an ideology, not a proposition.
COPY PLAYBOOK : What Worked → What Failed → What to Replicate → What to Avoid
THE STANDARD: Repurposing existing infrastructure lets you ship a complete new solution in days when demand shifts suddenly — but be honest about what a zero-commission model does not replace.
SEQUENCE:
1. Inventory what you already own that can be recombined.
2. Ship the recombination fast when demand moves.
3. State clearly what the customer still has to do themselves.
WORKED: A complete delivery ordering solution built in roughly a week by repurposing existing tablet-ordering infrastructure.
CAUTION:
1. POSITIONING AGAINST COMMISSION MARKETPLACES ON PRICE ONLY WORKS IF YOU REPLACE THEIR CORE VALUE — customer discovery. Restaurants still must drive their own traffic to a direct ordering system; implying a fixed fee eliminates all acquisition cost sets up disappointed customers.
2. FIXED-FEE MODELS CAP UPSIDE as customer volume grows.
bottom of page