top of page
Won by attacking the specific finance pain that emerged only after SaaS proliferation became a problem in itself — every company now has 50+ subscriptions and no one owns visibility into them — and built a payment card product around that gap rather than another expense-reporting tool.
1
MODEL
BUSINESS MODEL
SaaS, Embedded Services
model bm
HOW THEY BUILT IT
- Founded 2018 by Cristina Vila (later joined by co-founder Brad van Leeuwen), who experienced the internal chaos of unmanaged software subscriptions firsthand at a prior fintech startup.
- Combines SaaS spend visibility (tracking 57+ average subscriptions per company, plus 20+ a typical finance team doesn't even know about) with embedded virtual/physical payment cards designed specifically for software purchases — instant cancellation, no shared card numbers, and automated approval workflows.
- Named SaaS Startup of the Year 2018 by SaaStock and part of the 2019 Techstars London cohort, using industry-specific accelerator and conference credibility to build early trust in the fintech-adjacent nonprofit-founder space.
- Publishes an annual 'Software Spend Report' drawing on data from 600+ companies and over a million transactions, turning its own transactional data into a lead-generation and thought-leadership asset.
HOW TO ARCHITECT IT
1. Build the payment rails natively into the product (rather than integrating a generic corporate card) if your core value proposition is spend control, since instant cancellation and per-vendor card issuance are only possible if you own the payment layer directly.
2. Convert your own aggregated transaction data into a published industry report — this both markets the product implicitly (via data no one else can publish) and establishes category authority.
3. Target the specific moment a company's software stack becomes unmanageable (typically as headcount and department autonomy grow) rather than trying to sell spend-management to every company regardless of stage.
DISTRIBUTION MODEL
Direct Sales, Partnership Distribution
dm
HOW THEY OPERATIONALIZED
- Sold via direct sales to finance and IT leadership at growing companies, given the product requires integrating payment card issuance into existing financial workflows.
- Distribution amplified through fintech/SaaS accelerator networks (Techstars London) and industry conference credibility (SaaStock) that connected Cledara directly to its target buyer community of finance leaders at venture-backed companies.
HOW TO REPLICATE WHAT WORKED
What worked: owning the payment card layer directly rather than layering spend-visibility software on top of a customer's existing corporate card program, since instant per-vendor cancellation is impossible without owning the card issuance itself.
Trap if copied blindly: embedding into a customer's actual payment infrastructure (not just visibility/reporting) means carrying real financial and compliance risk (card fraud, PCI compliance, banking partnerships) that a pure SaaS reporting tool never has to manage — underestimating this operational complexity is the biggest risk in replicating this model.
| PATTERNS OF THIS MODEL
PATTERNS IN SPEND CONTROL THAT REQUIRES OWNING THE PAYMENT RAIL:
1. OWN THE PAYMENT RAIL WHEN THE VALUE PROPOSITION IS CONTROL. Instant cancellation and per-vendor issuance are only possible if you issue the card; visibility alone is a report, not a product.
2. CONVERT YOUR AGGREGATED TRANSACTION DATA INTO PUBLISHED INDUSTRY RESEARCH. It markets the product implicitly and establishes category authority no competitor can replicate.
3. TARGET THE MOMENT THE PROBLEM BECOMES UNMANAGEABLE — usually when departmental autonomy outpaces finance visibility — rather than selling to every company regardless of stage.
4. THE UNMANAGED-SPEND PROBLEM IS SELF-SOLVING FOR SOME CUSTOMERS. Prove ongoing savings or the tool becomes the next line item under review.
What companies with this model reveal
| OPPORTUNITY INTELLIGENCE
GOLDMINE 1 — OWN THE PAYMENT LAYER IF SPEND CONTROL IS THE PROMISE.
Standard: instant cancellation and per-vendor card issuance are only possible if you issue the cards. Integrating a generic corporate card would have made the product an observer rather than a controller.
GOLDMINE 2 — TURN YOUR TRANSACTION DATA INTO A PUBLISHED REPORT.
Standard: an annual Software Spend Report from 600+ companies and a million-plus transactions markets the product implicitly and establishes category authority nobody else can claim.
GOLDMINE 3 — SELL AT THE MOMENT THE STACK BECOMES UNMANAGEABLE.
Standard: 57+ average subscriptions with 20+ finance cannot see. The trigger is departmental autonomy plus headcount growth, not company size.
THE PIT — SaaS MANAGEMENT IS A COST-CUTTING TOOL, WHICH MAKES IT A COST-CUTTING TARGET.
Budget scrutiny both creates demand and questions every line item, including yours. Products sold on savings must prove savings continuously or become the saving.
THE SECOND PIT — BREX, RAMP AND SPENDESK BUNDLE THIS INTO A BROADER SPEND PLATFORM.
A single-purpose spend-visibility tool competes against free features of a card business.
MOVE WITH CAUTION — INTERCHANGE-DEPENDENT REVENUE FALLS WHEN YOUR PRODUCT SUCCEEDS AT REDUCING SPEND.
Untapped Business Model / Gaps / Goldmines / Pits
Patterns & Insights
2
MARKET
mkt mt es
MARKET TYPE
Emerging Market
WHY THEY WON
SaaS spend management as a distinct software category barely existed in 2018 — it emerged directly as a consequence of SaaS proliferation itself creating a new, quantifiable finance problem (companies wasting an average of ~$80,000/year on unused software). Cledara was among the earliest dedicated vendors in what was, at founding, a genuinely new category. Transferable principle: watch for problems created as a side effect of another category's success (SaaS adoption creating SaaS-spend chaos) — these second-order problems often become genuine new markets before most founders notice them.
ENTRY STRATEGY
Greenfield Entry
EXECUTION
Cledara entered a functionally new category (SaaS spend management with embedded payments) rather than displacing an established competitor, building both the product and the market's understanding of the problem simultaneously, evidenced by its early recognition as 'SaaS Startup of the Year' before the category had many named competitors.
FOOTHOLD STRATEGY
fs
Beachhead Strategy
The beachhead was growing tech companies (roughly 20-50+ employees) at the exact inflection point where software purchasing had outgrown the founder's personal credit card but hadn't yet been formalized into a controlled process — a well-defined, painful, and reachable moment common across the venture-backed startup ecosystem Cledara's founders knew personally. From that foothold, Cledara expanded into the U.S. and broader European markets and toward larger companies needing more sophisticated approval workflows and compliance controls.
GROWTH CAMPAIGN
CAMPAIGNS THAT WORKED
Annual Software Spend Report: aggregates data across hundreds of companies and transactions into a widely-cited industry benchmark, generating inbound interest from finance leaders researching their own spend patterns.
Techstars London cohort (2019) and SaaStock 'SaaS Startup of the Year' recognition (2018): early credibility signals that accelerated trust-building with its target finance-leader buyer persona.
G2 badge accumulation (16+ badges in a recent reporting period): used as ongoing social proof in a buyer community that relies on peer review platforms for vendor evaluation.
KEY LEARNING
If you're evaluating a new category to enter, look for problems that exist only as a second-order consequence of another category's widespread success — SaaS spend chaos is a direct byproduct of SaaS adoption itself, and similar second-order problems are often underserved simply because they're newer than the trend that created them.
gc
Market Context
| MARKET INTELLIGENCE
THE STANDARD: Problems created as a side effect of another category's success become genuine new markets before most founders notice them.
RULE 1 — CATEGORY PROLIFERATION CREATES CATEGORY MANAGEMENT. SaaS adoption at scale produced spend chaos no existing tool was built to see.
RULE 2 — THE VIRTUAL CARD IS THE CONTROL MECHANISM AND THE REVENUE MODEL AT ONCE. Issuing the payment instrument gives visibility, enforcement and interchange together.
RULE 3 — YOU MUST QUANTIFY WASTE TO JUSTIFY THE PURCHASE. Unused licence spend is the number that gets the finance buyer's attention.
RULE 4 — SPEND PLATFORMS EXPAND INTO YOUR CATEGORY FROM ABOVE. A SaaS-only tool must widen or be absorbed into general spend management.
MARKET TYPE: Emerging Market (SaaS spend management).
| MARKET ENTRY PLAYBOOK
THE STANDARD: EMBEDDING PAYMENT INTO A MANAGEMENT TOOL CONVERTS A REPORTING PRODUCT INTO CONTROL — and control is what finance actually buys.
RULE 1 — ISSUE THE CARD AND YOU OWN THE DATA.
Visibility products depend on someone entering information; payment products generate it automatically and completely.
RULE 2 — CREATING A CATEGORY MEANS NAMING A COST THE BUYER HAS NOT QUANTIFIED.
Software spend was scattered across departments and invisible; making it measurable creates the budget to manage it.
RULE 3 — EARLY RECOGNITION IS THE SUBSTITUTE FOR CATEGORY AWARENESS.
Awards and analyst attention supply credibility while the market is still learning the problem exists.
How to enter
| FOOTHOLD STRATEGY PLAYBOOK
THE STANDARD: The best entry point is a specific organisational moment, not a company profile.
RULE 1 — IDENTIFY THE INFLECTION WHERE AN INFORMAL PROCESS BREAKS. Software purchasing outgrows a founder's personal card at a predictable, observable headcount.
RULE 2 — CONTROL AND VISIBILITY ARE BOUGHT TOGETHER OR NEITHER IS ADOPTED. Spend data without the ability to act on it is a report nobody reads.
RULE 3 — ISSUING THE PAYMENT INSTRUMENT IS WHAT MAKES THE DATA COMPLETE AND THE PRODUCT UNAVOIDABLE. Owning the card owns the record.
RULE 4 — THE STARTUP ECOSYSTEM IS A REFERRAL NETWORK AND A CORRELATED RISK. A base of venture-backed companies contracts in unison when funding tightens.
How to get the first strong position
MARKET PATTERNS & PLAYBOOK
3
MONEY
money rev pri
REVENUE MODEL
Subscription, Transaction Fee
PRICING MODEL
Tiered Pricing
WHY THEY WON
Tiered monthly subscription (from roughly $75/month for managing up to 20 apps, to custom enterprise pricing for larger stacks) combined with potential interchange/transaction revenue from its embedded payment card program — a dual revenue stream from both the software layer and the payment infrastructure underlying it.
Pricing tiers scale explicitly with the number of software applications managed (20 apps at the Basic tier, 75 at Premium, custom above that), targeting the finance/IT buyer persona evaluating cost against the quantified waste (up to 23% reduction in SaaS spend claimed) the platform is designed to eliminate.
TARGET AUDIENCE
CUSTOMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR
tg cb
Finance leaders (CFOs, financial controllers) at growing tech companies (buying spend visibility and cost control); IT/operations teams (buying onboarding/offboarding automation for software access); department heads across the company (indirect users requesting new software purchases through the approval workflow).
Sales-led and committee-driven: finance and IT stakeholders jointly evaluate the platform against existing expense-management tools, typically triggered by a specific pain event (a surprise renewal charge, an unused-seat audit) rather than proactive shopping, with a demo-and-onboarding-supported sales cycle.
| PRICING INTELLIGENCE
What makes this model effective & make customers pay
Software that manages software spend is priced against the subscriptions it cancels — an unusually clean ROI story.
RULE 1 — IDENTIFIED WASTE IS THE VALUE METRIC AND IT IS VISIBLE IN THE FIRST MONTH.
Duplicate tools, unused seats and forgotten renewals are found immediately. That number justifies the fee instantly.
RULE 2 — ISSUING THE CARD IS WHAT MAKES CONTROL REAL AND CREATES A SECOND REVENUE LINE.
Visibility without payment control is advisory. Interchange grows with customer spend.
RULE 3 — TIER ON SUBSCRIPTIONS MANAGED, NOT ON FINANCE SEATS.
The team is small; the portfolio is not.
RULE 4 — THE PRODUCT SUCCEEDS BY REDUCING THE THING IT MEASURES.
Helping customers cut subscriptions shrinks your own meter. Design the pricing so success does not cannibalise you.
A finance leader is buying the end of discovering subscriptions on a card statement. Where the buyer feels out of control, visibility is worth more than savings — and the savings arrive anyway.
PRICE & REVENUE
| Revenue Risk - The biggest threat to revenue stability
Combining a subscription with interchange from an embedded card programme is the right dual structure and makes a share of revenue dependent on card-scheme economics you do not set.
Selling software that helps customers cancel software is a value proposition that eventually points at you.
SaaS-management tools are being bundled by spend-management platforms funded by interchange, which can give the software away.
Pricing by number of apps managed means a customer consolidating their stack — your stated purpose — reduces your revenue.
No revenue or customer figures published.
Where the model can break
4
MOTION
GROWTH EXPANSION MODEL
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
motion ge cs
Geographic Expansion, Product Line Expansion
HOW THEY EXPAND
Cledara expanded from its London/Barcelona base into the U.S. market (adding a New York office) and broadened its product beyond SaaS-only spend to include travel and general business expense management alongside its core software spend platform, sequenced to increase wallet share within existing finance-team customers before pursuing entirely new customer segments.
Differentiation
HOW THEY COMPETE
Cledara differentiates against generic expense-management tools (like Spendesk, which one customer cited switching away from specifically for lack of per-subscription ownership visibility) by building spend management purpose-built for software specifically, rather than treating SaaS subscriptions as just another expense category among travel and office supplies.
GROWTH ENGINE
GTM
ge n gtm
Content Flywheel
Growth compounds through the annual Software Spend Report and ongoing spend-benchmark content: aggregated data from hundreds of customer companies becomes a widely-cited industry resource that draws new prospects researching their own SaaS spend problem, each of whom becomes a future data point strengthening the next report. It would break down if a larger, better-funded competitor began publishing more comprehensive or more frequently updated benchmark data, diluting Cledara's authority on the topic.
Direct sales to finance/IT leadership supported by accelerator and industry-conference credibility (Techstars, SaaStock) in its early years, reinforced ongoing by published research (the annual Software Spend Report) that generates inbound interest from finance teams researching their own spend patterns.
SUSTAINING MOATS
Switching Costs, High Customer Lock-In, Brand Power, Technology Advantage (complex enterprise scenarios)
moat
Cledara's moat combines proprietary aggregated spend-benchmark data (used to advise customers on negotiating better renewals) with the switching cost of having every company credit card, approval workflow, and vendor relationship routed through its platform — unwinding that means re-issuing every company card and re-establishing every vendor payment relationship from scratch.
| MOAT INTELLIGENCE
THE STANDARD: Issuing the card that pays for software makes you the system of record for what a company actually uses.
RULE 1 — CONTROLLING PAYMENT MEANS CONTROLLING VISIBILITY. Discovery based on surveys is incomplete; discovery based on transactions is total, because nothing gets used without being paid for.
RULE 2 — THE RENEWAL CALENDAR IS THE PRODUCT. Knowing what auto-renews next month, at what price, is where the saving happens — and it is only reliable if you hold the payment instrument.
RULE 3 — INTERCHANGE FUNDS THE SOFTWARE, WHICH SETS THE PRICE FLOOR FOR EVERY COMPETITOR selling spend management as a subscription.
THE SIGNAL: aggregated pricing data across thousands of buyers is the asset with real long-term value, because it converts a management tool into negotiating leverage the customer cannot get anywhere else.
Why this company remains defensible
ARR & TAKEAWAY
ARR Journey - what to do at each stage
PRE-$1M ARR — ISSUE THE CARD, THEN SELL THE VISIBILITY
Companies cannot see their software spend because it is scattered across employees' cards. Becoming the payment instrument is what makes the data complete.
Sell to finance leaders at 50–500 person companies drowning in subscriptions.
$1–5M ARR — INTERCHANGE PLUS SUBSCRIPTION IS THE MODEL
Card revenue scales with the customer's spend; the software fee makes the relationship durable. Neither alone supports the business.
WATCH: software spend under management.
$5–10M ARR — RENEWAL ALERTS AND CANCELLATION ARE THE HABIT
The product must actively save money each month or the subscription becomes the thing being cancelled.
$10–50M ARR — YOU ARE COMPETING WITH SPEND-MANAGEMENT FINTECHS
Ramp, Brex, Spendesk and Pleo all issue cards. SaaS-specific depth — licence tracking, compliance, vendor data — is the differentiation.
NOTE: no ARR disclosed; reported funding varies by source.
$50–100M ARR — CONSOLIDATION IN EUROPEAN SPEND MANAGEMENT
Regional players are natural acquisitions for larger platforms expanding geographically.
$100M+ ARR — NOT IN EVIDENCE
Rule: to see a category of spend, you usually have to become the payment rail. Software that only observes gets cancelled first in a cost review.
COPY PLAYBOOK : What Worked → What Failed → What to Replicate → What to Avoid
THE STANDARD: Own the payment instrument rather than layering visibility software on top of the customer's existing cards. Some functions are impossible without controlling issuance.
SEQUENCE:
1. Identify the action your product promises that requires control, not just data.
2. Own the instrument that makes that action possible.
3. Accept the compliance and fraud burden that comes with it.
WORKED: Card issuance enabling instant per-vendor cancellation — a capability a pure reporting tool structurally cannot offer.
CAUTION:
1. EMBEDDING IN PAYMENT INFRASTRUCTURE MEANS CARRYING REAL FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE RISK — fraud, PCI, banking partnerships — that a reporting tool never touches. Underestimating this operational complexity is the biggest risk in the model.
2. SPEND-VISIBILITY IS BEING BUNDLED by corporate card and expense platforms with far more capital.
bottom of page